Guide
Sysdig vs Lacework
Frustrated with Lacework missing critical container and cloud threats?
Choose Sysdig over Lacework
Don’t fly blind relying on a black box tool that provides no visibility on how detection policies are built and only limited customization options for your unique cloud infrastructure and workloads. Tools like Lacework lack the deep visibility and rich context you need to accurately detect, prioritize, and immediately respond to threats with reliable forensics across containers and clouds.
The Sysdig difference against Lacework:
Accurate, multi-layered detection approach for hosts, containers, and clouds based on Falco open source engine integrated with ML behavioral analytics.
Real-time detection with no event reporting gaps and complete, detailed forensic data captures.
Limited detection coverage and forensics.
Gaps in reporting security events.
Designed around Kubernetes native constructs and integrations for full context.
No permissions and entitlements management.
Limited Kubernetes context for incident response.
Community contributions and validation for maximum and trusted coverage.
No visibility into platform logic, limited customization options.
This checklist provides a feature comparison across container and cloud security between Sysdig Secure and Lacework.
We compare over 80 features in several areas:
- Foundational Solution Features
- Vulnerability Management
- Runtime Security
- Incident Response and Forensics
- Kubernetes Security
- Cloud Security
- Compliance and Benchmarks
Download this guide to help you choose the right container and cloud security solution for your environment.